The importance of adversarial proceedings

When someone reports cross-border behavior, it is often a courageous step. Reporting carries risks: fear of repercussions, social exclusion or not being taken seriously. For the reporter, it is crucial that their story is acknowledged and heard.

The courage of the reporter: risk and recognition

At the same time, for the alleged perpetrator, an accusation is often equally profound. Especially if a report is made anonymously. Without hearsay, a person’s reputation can be damaged, careers terminated and social relationships irreparably damaged. Allegations may in some cases be inaccurate or incomplete, and a fair assessment requires that even this person be given a chance to present his or her side of the story.

Why rebuttal is essential to fair judgment

The adversarial principle means that both parties in a dispute must be given the opportunity to tell their side of the story. In reports of transgressive behavior, this means that not only is the victim heard, but also the alleged perpetrator is given an opportunity to respond. In the context of integrity issues – such as allegations of fraud, abuse of power or conflicts of interest – a hearing is essential to prevent someone from being wrongfully convicted or an organization from acting carelessly.

The difference in perspective: the value of diligence

Reporter and alleged perpetrator often have different perspectives on the same event. Care is very important.
In issues of transgressive behavior and integrity, the stakes are often high: the dignity of the victim, the reputation of the alleged perpetrator and the credibility of the organization. Hearsay provides a crucial compass for navigating these complex situations.